no. 1 |
no. 2 |
during our discussion i showed husband the two roger fenton photos from the crimean war. and interestingly, husband had an entirely new perspective on them, one not mentioned in the errol morris book (which i love even more now after chapter 4 - about the FSA photos taken by walker evans and others during the depression...more about that soon). and one definitely not mentioned by susan sontag in her take on the photos.
husband looked at them as a soldier and an officer. i told him there was controversy over the sequence of the photos. it was known that that were taken on the same day during the same shoot, but that the interpretations of the meaning of them were different depending on which one you thought was taken first. you also recall that i didn't tell you what morris' conclusion was (i still think you must get the book - via your library, i'm not advocating consumerism (tho' i want to own this book now)).
husband's take is that no. 2 is first, because it represents a "before" shot - tho' after a barrage of shelling by the russians. before in the sense of before the road was cleared for the soldiers to pass with their wagons and horses and continue the war. no. 1 comes after it was cleared.
what do you think?
2 comments:
Better run that idea by General Sue Sontag (retired). After all, she was the officer in charge of propaganda, media relations and photography wagons and mules.
The question which cannot be answered is why did Fenton include both photos in exhibitions? Did he want to gauge audience reaction? Did he, or the gallery agents consider the photos as a before and after sequence?
Apparently he felt no ambiguity with showing the photos side by side.
As for which came first, the explanation of rock movement seems valid. Also the number of canon balls being the same in each photo is good evidence that photo No. 2 was posed (a composed photo).
Post a Comment